AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() One of the big problem with using OSM’s standard map for iNaturalist is that its map labels are in the local language. OSM is improving every day but it still has large gaps in its coverage in many countries. There are some areas of the planet where OSM is notably better, some areas where it is notably worse, but Google has by and large managed to maintain a map that has acceptable detail globally. If I’m marking the location of a sighting in any detail at all (and imo what sets iNat apart from other citizen science project is the spatial resolution of its data), satellite imagery is key. ![]() ![]() ![]() I think this is a must, especially for locating in detail the location of a sighting that may not have GPS data attached to it. As someone who has spent a lot of time both personally and professionally looking at GIS and web-hosting options, I think in general the use of Google Maps is better for some reasons I’ll lay out below, but that it cannot hurt to show a simple leaflet OSM map for users with a Chinese IP address. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |